The Battle for your Private Cloud has begun....


OPENSTACK & CLOUDSTACK STRATEGIC COMPARISON



PROVISIONING NETAPP FLEXPODs with VMWARE on CISCO


AMAZON WEB 2.0 SERVICE CLOUDS FOR ALL



MICROSOFT FROM BARE METAL TO PRIVATE CLOUD


Monday, June 25, 2012

Drink the new MS koolaid, its delicious : TechEd 2012 and more ramblings...

 


Click here to search for all the Lync Videos or see the individual sessions below.  

Lync 2010: Planning Voice Features, Subbu Chandarasekaran
Lync 2010: Planning Voice Deployments, Subbu Chandarasekaran
Lync Deep Dive: Dial Plans and Voice Management Deep Dive, Javed Tufail
Lync 2010: Unlocking Your CORE CAL with Lync, Marc Perez
Lync Deep Dive: Edge Media Connectivity with ICE, Bryan Nyce
Lync and the Enterprise Network, Bryan Nyce
Best Practices in Securing Your Microsoft Lync Server 2010 Edge Servers, Rui Maximo
Microsoft Lync 2010: Planning for Conferencing Deployments, Paul Brombley
Microsoft Lync 2010: Server and Client Virtualization, Campbell Gunn
Microsoft Lync 2010: Availability, Resiliency, and Recovery, Paul Brombley
Forget about IT: How about Lync Inside Business Applications?, Albert Kooiman
  DOWNLOAD CU6
 Official Lync CU6 Links

Source:  T. Arbuthnot

MICROSOFT SKPE'D,  SURFACED and YAMMER'D
Estonian labs chief says working for Microsoft hasn't changed Skype

Microsoft buys social-office network Yammer for $1.2 billion

CNET.COM - MS SURFACE ANALYSIS

It was getting harder and harder to catch Apple's iPad. So, Microsoft took matters into its own hands, says a report.

Was Microsoft's Surface tablet an act of desperation? Yes, says a report in the New York Times.
Microsoft and the PC hardware industry were failing miserably at taking on Apple's iPad, forcing Redmond's hand, according to the report.
How critical was the situation becoming? Some assertions from the article:
  • Apple's control of key materials: Materials like high-quality aluminum were purchased in such large quantities that Apple virtually cornered the market. Because PC makers were not responding to threats like this, Microsoft feared PC players were falling further and further behind Apple.
  • Shortcomings of the Microsoft-Intel business model: Microsoft and Intel -- so-called "Wintel" -- sucked up much of the profit, leaving PC makers with limited resources to innovate.
  • Lack of trust between Microsoft and PC makers: device makers lost faith in Microsoft. Despite demanding hefty licensing fees, Microsoft was not delivering the touch capability that was necessary to be competitive. HP "fumed" at Microsoft's inability to craft decent touch software sooner. For example, the Windows 7 touch experience was subpar, hardly measuring up to Apple.
  • Failed Hewlett-Packard tablets: HP's Intel-based Windows tablet -- first shown at CES in 2010 -- ultimately suffered from mediocre chips, buggy software, and HP's decision to use merely "sufficient" components. And HP's strategy of buying Palm and creating the TouchPad failed.